Ekološka antropologija

Predmet obravnava odnos ljudi do njihovega bio-fizičnega okolja in drugih vrst, njihove rabe in družbene pomene. Obravnava procese, s katerimi skupnosti prepoznavajo, pretvarjajo in drugače podružabijo okolje v svojo naravno in kulturno dediščino (identitete).
Zgodovinska in medkulturna primerjava ekoloških adaptacij dopolnjujeta k družbi in kulturi usmerjeno optiko na področju socialne in kulturne antropologije 20. stoletja, pri čemer se predmet izogiba novim determinizmom.
Pri obravnavanju vzajemnosti med antropocentrično naravo in kulturo so uporabljeni tudi primeri iz klimatologije, geologije, botanike, zoologije, geografije, arheologije, demografije, epidemiologije, gastronomije, medicine, tehnologije, menedžmenta ipd.
Teoretske modele podkrepimo z etnografskimi primeri in jih ovrednotimo.

1. Barth, Fredrik. 2008 [1956] Ecological Relationships of Ethnic Groups in Swat. American Anthropologist 58(6): 1079-1089. JSTOR: https://www.jstor.org/stable/666295
2. Baš, Franjo. 1954. Pripombe k požigalništvu. Slovenski etnograf 6/7: 83-102 [COBISS.SI-ID - 239750144]; http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-3EFGNBHC
3. Chua, L. & H. Fair. 2019. Anthropocene. V: The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Anthropology (ur. Stein, F. idr.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://doi.org/10.29164/19anthro
4. Conklin, Harold C. 1961. The Study of Shifting Cultivation. Current Anthropology 2/1: 27-61. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2739597
5. Dove, Michael R., Carol Carpenter (ur.). 2008. Environmental Anthropology. A Historical Reader Malden, Oxford, Victoria: Blackwell Publishing. (izbrana poglavja).
6. Gould, Stephen Jay. 1991 Darwinova revolucija. Ljubljana: Krt. (izbrana poglavja). [COBISS.SI-ID - 24185600]
7. Harris, Marvin. 1992. The Cultural Ecology of India's Sacred Cattle. Current Anthropology 33/1: 261-276. [COBISS.SI-ID - 5889031]; https://www.jstor.org/stable/2743946
8. Hughes, Donald J. 1983. How the Ancients Viewed Deforestation. Journal of Field Archaeology 10/4: 435-445. [COBISS.SI-ID - 4737546]; https://www.jstor.org/stable/529466
9. Kirkley, Eben. S. in S. Helmreich. 2010. The Emergence of Multispecies Ethnography. Cultural Anthropology 25/4: 545-576. [COBISS.SI-ID - 589077]; https://www.jstor.org/stable/40930489
10. Kottak, Conrad P. 1999. The New Ecological Anthropology. American Anthropologist 101/1: 23-35. [COBISS.SI-ID – 517652505]; [COBISS.SI-ID 24922112] ; https://www.jstor.org/stable/683339
11. Oelschlaeger, Max. 1991. The Idea of Wilderness. New Haven, London: Yale University. [COBISS.SI-ID 35287040]
12. Palsson, Gisli. 1996. Human-environmental relations: orientalism, paternalism, communalism. Nature and Society (Descola, Philippe, Gisli Palsson – ur.). London, New York: Routledge, str. 63-81. [COBISS.SI-ID 40339969]
13. Ramšak, Mojca. 2019. Etnobotanična metodologija – etnološki pristop. Hladnikia 43: 3-28. [COBISS.SI-ID - 1644429]; http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-C4ZRBXZT
14. Braidotti, Rosi, Mária Hlavajová (ur.) 2018. Posthuman Glossary. London [idr.]: Bloomsbury Academic. [COBISS.SI-ID 139577603]
15. Rappaport, Roy A. 1984. Pigs for the Ancestors. Ritual in the Ecology of a New Guinea People. Prospect Heights: Waveland Press. (izbrana poglavja) [COBISS.SI-ID - 28022114]
16. White, Leslie. 1943. Energy and the Evolution of Culture. American Anthropologist (New Series) 3/1: 335-356. [COBISS.SI-ID - 517652505]; https://www.jstor.org/stable/663173
17. Wilson, Sheena, Adam Carlson in Imre Szeman. 2017. Petrocultures. Oil, Politics, Culture. Montreal, London, Chicago: MyGill-Queen University Press. (izbrana poglavja). http://nukweb.nuk.uni-lj.si/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/logi…